Download Free PDF View PDF
Download Free PDF View PDF
Download Free PDF View PDF
Download Free PDF View PDF
This article presents a concise overview on condition monitoring and retrofitting/ strengthening of structures including a practical case study of strengthening for an existing historical building. Condition assessment of an existing structure is required mainly to check serviceability and safety requirements of the structure after short term events like earthquake or long term degradation of the structure with time. It is carried out to assess the ability of a structure to perform its intended operations under changed loading conditions with time or modification in its structural system as per newly imposed requirements. The condition assessment and strengthening may also be required for integrated extension of an existing structure. After assessing the condition of the structure, either it is retrofitted (or strengthened) or it is demolished according to the severity of the damage. In this article, such a critical condition assessment for an existing historical masonry building is presented and appropriate strengthening schemes are suggested by following two separate measures (concrete jacketing and fiber reinforced polymer strengthening). Subsequently, the relative advantages and disadvantages of the strengthening measures are discussed from a practical engineering perspective. Aim of this article is not to propose any new method for condition assessment and strengthening of structures, rather we take a systematic approach to demonstrate our experience. Critical case studies on condition assessment and strengthening of historical buildings with adequate technical insights are very scarce to find in scientific literature. This article would serve as a valuable reference for the practicing engineers and the concerned scientific community.
Download Free PDF View PDF
Download Free PDF View PDF
The terrorist activities and threats have become a growing problem in Egypt and all over the world. Protection of the citizens against terrorist acts involves prediction, prevention and mitigation of such events. In the case of structures, an effective mitigation may also be thought in terms of structural resistance and physical integrity. So, there is a need to become familiar with the issue of a progressive collapse due to sudden removal of one bearing element or by blast load. This will help in proposing some guidelines for Egyptian Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures (ECP. 203-2007) and Egyptian Code of Practice for Calculating Loads and Forces on Structures and Buildings (ECP. 201-2012) on the verification of structures exposed to a progressive collapse due to sudden removal of one bearing element or by explosions. Progressive collapse prevention of buildings has recently become the focus of many researchers, design engineers, and officials all over the world particularly after the failure of the twin World Trade Center towers, New York City, USA in September 2001 and the increasing terrorist acts against governmental buildings. To date, there are design guidelines which are prepared by different bodies like Department of defense (DoD) in USA, the General Service Administration (GSA) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Among the causes of the progressive collapse is the blast loads caused by explosions or terrorist attack. Generally, conventional structures are not designed for blast loads due to the reason that the magnitude of load caused by blast can be huge and therefore, the cost of design and construction is very high. Up to now, there are no code requirements for blast design. Only guidelines, for example; design guidelines for military structures for blast loads (TM-5-1300) which is periodically updated and a more functional version of it is currently, UFC 3-340-02, by DoD, USA. While design for progressive collapse prevention is possible at the design stage, it becomes more challenging for already existing buildings. On the other hand, almost all recently designed and constructed buildings are designed for seismic resistance. Seismic design provisions allow for higher resistance to lateral reversible loads, and more ductility of structural frames and systems. Determining how much such provision adds to the building resistance to progressive collapse help when upgrading existing building for progressive collapse or when designing new ones. Furthermore, utilizing this seismic resistance and added ductility could be utilized when designing for progressive collapse. This research focuses on identifying the effect of seismic design on resisting progressive collapse due to sudden removal of one bearing element or due to blast loads. Numerical simulation of a progressive collapse of structures using computer has a variable actual apprehension for structural engineers due to their interest in structures veracity estimation. This simulation helps engineers to develop methods for increasing or decreasing the progressive failure. In this research, first, a verification of the computer program Extreme Loading for Structures (ELS) based on Applied Element method (AEM) is conducted. Numerical modelling based on seven experimental studies available in the literature are utilized for verification. The obtained numerical results showed the capability of AEM in simulation of the progressive collapse behavior of structures. Furthermore, the results showed a better accuracy than those obtained using other software packages such as; OPENSEES, ABACUS and MSC MARC. Second, the progressive collapse for three low rise reinforced concrete framed buildings using non-linear dynamic analysis is presented. The first building is a symmetrical regular building which is designed using ECP. 203-2007 for gravity loads but without taking lateral loads into consideration. The second building has the same dimensions of the first building but designed using ECP. 203-2007 for both gravity and lateral loads using ECP 201-2012. The third building is a unsymmetrical building which is designed for both gravity and lateral loads using ECP 201-2012. The study includes a progressive collapse by sudden removal of one of the main load bearing vertical elements according to both GSA (2003) guidelines scenarios and new suggested scenarios based on the virtual work diagrams (VMD) functionality provided in SAP2000 for the critical members. Moreover, a study for progressive collapse by blast loads with different scaled distance is presented. The obtained results showed that the vulnerability to progressive collapse becomes less in the seismic design building than the building which isn’t seismic design. This is mainly due to the increased member capacity, added ductility and the seismic requirement for reinforcement details. Also, the results showed that the new suggested scenario based on VMD is more critical than GSA (2003) scenarios. In addition, the results showed the failure of columns due to sudden column loss is less in effect than the failure of column due to blast loads. Moreover, the results showed as the blast load scaling distance increased; the behavior of building is changed from no effect, near columns failure but no collapse, partially collapse and total collapse. Finally, the results showed the new suggested scenario based on VMD technique can aid structural engineers in choosing which of the corner, edge and interior column is the most critical column for each case in the building especially, for unsymmetrical building.
Download Free PDF View PDF
Exploring Novel Retrofitting Techniques on Existing Buildings for Earthquake Mitigation
To date, the seismic threat is still one of the main problems that governments in developing countries must face. Indeed, earthquakes threat to cause many casualties and financial losses from the collapse of weak/unfit buildings. The complete deconstruction and reconstruction of a very large number of unfit structures in crowded Lebanese cities such as Beirut, Saida and Tripoli, would pose major and mostly unsurmountable difficulties of social, economic and environmental nature. This project aims to propose a useful alternative based on the idea of strengthening weak constructions (with minimal resource for traditional retrofitting techniques) by designing an additional structural system that would connect adjacent buildings to each other and increase their combined resistance capacity, thus preventing losses. The methodology retained for this study is to propose a strengthening solution that would provide a suitable combined resistance against seismic activity along one spatial direction and implement this solution on several adjacent structures in both directions to achieve full seismic resistance. To simulate weak structures, a typical twelve story high residential building was designed by our team according the building codes and standards (ACI 314-18; ASCE 7-10; LIBNOR NL-135), but under wind and gravity load only (i.e. excluding earthquake loads). Afterwards, two such identical buildings were placed ten meters apart and checked (independently) against seismic loads applied in one direction. Because the buildings were not initially designed to sustain earthquake loads, these presented failures in vertical members, slabs and shear walls, as expected, mainly at low-level floors. To reduce the computational time and cost of trying several connecting structures on the real buildings, the latter were replaced by simplified frames of similar structural and mass properties. The surrogate frames were hence used to determine the best connecting alternative in terms of lateral drift and internal forces reduction. The solution retained (corresponding to a lateral bracing system between two buildings) was tested and fine-tuned on the real structures so as to yield the best possible combined earthquake resistance. A few remaining structural elements were strengthened using traditional retrofitting techniques, such as the steel jacketing of columns. This combined solution provided the required strength needed to support earthquake loads.
Download Free PDF View PDF